Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The narcotic antagonist naloxone enhances clinical pain

Abstract

ENDOGENOUS opiate-like substances (endorphins) have been isolated from the brain in a variety of species, including man1,2. Furthermore, there is recent evidence that the brain possesses an analgesia-producing system. The distribution of endorphins is consistent and overlaps significantly with central nervous system sites such as the midbrain periaqueductal grey which produce analgesia when activated by electrical stimulation or opiate microinjection3–5. This raises the possibility that the analgesia is mediated by endorphin release. At present very little is known about the factors which trigger endorphin release. One obvious possibility is that the pain suppression system is activated by noxious stimuli. In fact, it has been observed that noxious stimuli delivered at one region of the body reduce the reported intensity of a distant noxious stimulus6. Furthermore, studies of the component neurones of this analgesia-producing system are consistent with the idea that it is activated by noxious stimuli7,8. If the action of the analgesia-producing system is mediated by endogenous morphine-like compounds, then disruption of this system by naloxone, a pure opiate antogonist, would be expected, to increase the perceived intensity of a maintained noxious stimulus. Some animal studies report no effect of naloxone alone on baseline pain thresholds9,10; in other studies, however, a shortening of latencies on hot-plate and tail-flick tests has been observed11,12. In humans, pain thresholds are unaffected by naloxone alone13,14. However, reversal of analgesia produced by electrical stimulation15,16 or by acupuncture17 has been reported. In 1965 Lasagna commented on the “curious hyper-algesic effect” of naloxone in patients with postoperative pain18. These observations suggested that clinical pain might provide a more appropriate model to study the action of endorphins. We demonstrate here that following the extraction of impacted wisdom teeth, naloxone causes a significantly greater increase in reported pain intensity than placebo, an observation consistent with the suggested participation of endorphins in an intrinsic pain suppression system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes, J. et al. Nature 258, 577–579 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simantov, R., Goodman, R., Aposhian, D. & Snyder, S. H. Brain Res. 111, 204–211 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiller, J. M., Pearson, J. & Simon, E. J. Res. Commun. chem. Pathol. Pharmac. 6, 1052–62 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer, D. J. & Price, D. D. Pain 2, 379–404 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, V. A. & Gebhart, G. F. Brain Res. 124, 283–303 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy, J. D., Wolff, H. G. & Goodell, H. J. clin. Invest. 23, 503 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, S. D., Basbaum, A. I. & Fields, H. L. Brain Res. 123, 363–368 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobatz, M. A., Proudfit, H. K. & Anderson, E. G. Neurosci. Abstr. 3, 296 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein, A., Pryor, G. T., Otis, L. S. & Larsen, F. Life Sci. 18, 599–604 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berkowitz, B. A., Ngai, S. H. & Finck, A. D. Science 194, 967–968 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacob, J. J., Tremblay, E. C., Colombel, M. Psychopharmacologia 37, 217 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berntson, G. G. & Walker, J. M. Brain Res. Bull. 2, 157–159 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Sobky, A., Dostrovsky, J. O. & Wall, P. D. Nature 263, 783–784 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grevert, P. & Goldstein, G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 1291–94 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Adams, J. E. Pain 2, 161–166 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosobuchi, Y., Adams, J. E. & Linchitz, R. Science 197, 183–186 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayer, D. J., Price, D. D. & Rafii, A. Brain Res. 121, 360–373 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lasagna, L. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58, 978–983 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott, J. & Huskisson, E. C. Pain 2, 175–184 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Joyce, C. R. B., Zutshi, D. W., Hrubes, V. & Mason, R. M. Eur. J. clin. Pharmac. 8, 415–420 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berkowitz, B., Finck, A. D. & Ngai, S. H. Neurosci. Abstr. 3, 286 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goodman, L. S. & Gilman, A. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th edn (Macmillan, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hayes, R. L., Harris, R. D., Wolskee, P. J. & Dubner, R. Neurosci. Abstr. 3, 483 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveras, J. L., Hosobuchi, Y., Redjemi, F., Guilband, G. & Besson, J. H. Brain Res. 120, 221–229 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M. & Droppleman, L. F. Profile of Mood States (Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LEVINE, J., GORDON, N., JONES, R. et al. The narcotic antagonist naloxone enhances clinical pain. Nature 272, 826–827 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272826a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272826a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing