Neural correlates of choice behavior related to impulsivity and venturesomeness
Highlights
► An enriched sample was recruited (gamblers, drug users and gambling/drug-naïve). ► Intertemporal/risk-related choice was associated with fronto-parietal activity. ► During intertemporal choice ACC and vlPFC activity correlated with impulsivity. ► During intertemporal choice OFC, ACC and caudate correlated with venturesomeness. ► Study gave targets for research investigating the neural substrates of impulsivity.
Introduction
Impulsivity has been linked to a wide range of psychiatric disorders and potentially problematic behaviors. Heightened impulsivity is considered to be an important factor underlying impulse-control disorders identified by the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), which includes disorders such as pathological gambling. Furthermore, increased impulsivity has also been linked with addiction disorders such as drug abuse (Allen et al., 1998, Kirby and Petry, 2004, Madden et al., 1997). Impulsivity can be divided into several sub-behaviors; lack of forethought prior to behavioral response, decreased ability to withhold inappropriate responses and an inability to tolerate delay (Allen et al., 1998, Dawe and Loxton, 2004, Evenden, 1999, Enticott and Ogloff, 2006). Delay intolerance (also termed “impulsive choice”) has been widely studied in relation to drug and gambling addiction as patients have reliably been shown to express a biased preference for immediate rewards over long-term, but relatively larger, rewards compared to non-drug using/non-gambling controls (for a review see Reynolds, 2006). Within addicted drug users and gamblers this difference in behavior has been associated with a biased focus on short-term or immediate rewards (e.g. the hedonic aspects of a drug high) over longer-term rewards (e.g. better health). This bias has been linked to differential functioning of regions within the brain, particularly limbic and prefrontal regions that underlie reward-related decision-making (for recent reviews, see Perry and Carroll, 2008, Verdejo-Garcia et al., 2008).
Several recent papers have identified a network of brain regions involved in choice during delay discounting tasks, which measure levels of impulsive choice. This system predominantly includes lateral and ventromedial prefrontal regions, parietal cortex and ventral striatum (Kable and Glimcher, 2007, McClure et al., 2004, McClure et al., 2007, Peters and Büchel, 2009, Weber and Huettel, 2008, Xu et al., 2009). However, the association between impulsivity and neural function within this system remains unclear. Several papers have investigated the correlation between impulsivity and another sub-behavior of impulsivity, response inhibition. These studies have shown that during response inhibition, impulsivity is correlated with activity in dorsal and ventral lateral regions of the prefrontal cortex, predominantly within the right hemisphere, in addition to the insula (Asahi et al., 2004, Horn et al., 2003, Kaladjian et al., 2011) indicating that the performance of these areas may be sensitive to individual levels of impulsivity.
One issue when investigating the effects of impulsivity on substance abuse is that it is unclear whether impulsivity pre-dates substance use or is due to neurochemical consequences of substance abuse. The study of pathological gamblers, which has been termed a “behavioral addiction” and thus one where direct physiologically or neuropsychological harmful effects of the addiction are absent, is less confounded by this issue. There is increasing evidence that impulsivity pre-dates gambling addiction and may be a vulnerability marker for the development of other addictive behaviors including substance abuse (for a recent review in this area, see Verdejo-Garcia et al., 2008).
Venturesomeness identifies a different dimension to impulsivity as described above (Kirby & Finch, 2010) and includes sensation or thrill seeking and taking risks for pleasure (Eysenck et al., 1990, Eysenck et al., 1985). It has received relatively less study than impulsivity despite evidence for greater self-reported venturesomeness in pathological samples, such as ecstasy and polydrug users, compared to controls (Butler and Montgomery, 2004, Allen et al., 1998, Morgan, 1998) although a recent paper found no such effect (Clark, Roiser, Robbins, & Sahakian, 2009). Choice involving risk activates decision-making brain networks including prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, insula and dorsal striatum (Koeneke et al., 2008, Smith et al., 2009). Activity within dorsal and ventromedial prefrontal cortices and the insula has been correlated with risk-seeking attitude (Clark et al., 2008, Knoch et al., 2006, Steinberg, 2008) however it is unclear as to how variations in brain activity are linked to venturesomeness.
The current study investigates whether regions of the brain associated with inter-temporal choice and risky choice (using novel delay and probability discounting tasks) are associated with self-reported impulsivity and venturesomeness. Previous studies have predominantly investigated non-gambling/non-drug using participants, or comparisons between pathological and control groups, which may limit the general applicability of such findings to the wider population. To address this, we recruited an enriched sample including drug users and gamblers so as to obtain a range of impulsivity and venturesomeness scores linked to behavioral consequences. We then used a correlational approach to relate region-specific neural responses to choices involving delays or risk similar to that in a previous study of memory (Valdes et al., 2006). Using a broader sampling approach allows investigation of potential biological vulnerability markers for addiction and provides targets for future research into the underlying mechanisms of pathological behavior. Based upon the literature, we hypothesised that intertemporal and risk-related choice would be associated with activity in prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices (Kable and Glimcher, 2007, Koeneke et al., 2008, McClure et al., 2004, McClure et al., 2007, Peters and Büchel, 2009, Smith et al., 2009, Weber and Huettel, 2008, Xu et al., 2009). We also undertook exploratory analysis to investigate whether impulsivity and venturesomeness would correlate with neural activity in different brain areas during intertemporal and risk-related choice.
Section snippets
Subjects
Advertisements were placed though the University of Manchester and the GamCare website (www.gamcare.org) asking for regular gamblers, regular drug users and non-gambling, non-drug using individuals. “Regular” was defined as use of drugs or actively gambling at least once a week for the past 6 months. Nine non-gamblers/drug users, 10 regular illicit drug users and 15 regular gamblers were recruited, giving a total sample size of 34 participants. The mean age was 23.82 years (range = 18–49 years) and
Questionnaire results
Demographic information, IVE-I and IVE-V scores are shown in Table 1. IVE-I scores differed significantly across behavioral groups, F(2,33) = 4.24, p = 0.02, with gamblers (M = 9.87, SD = 5.18) and drug users (M = 9.30, SD = 4.99) having significantly higher impulsivity scores (p = 0.009 and p = 0.029 respectively) than non-gambling/non-drug using participants (M = 4.56, SD = 2.01). Although IVE-V scores did not differ significantly between behavioral groups, F(2,33) = 2.09, p = 0.14, drug users (M = 12.20, SD = 3.49)
Discussion
This study investigated the neural correlates of inter-temporal and risky choice and association with behavioral impulsivity and venturesomeness on neural functioning during these choices. The main findings are that choices involving delayed vs. probabilistic rewards involve similar but not identical neural regions suggesting partially separable processes. Additionally, correlational analysis identified different regions associated with variation in impulsivity and venturesomeness providing
Acknowledgements
Part of this research was funded by a studentship from the Research in Gambling Trust (RIGT) awarded to N. Hinvest. This paper was written up during a Research Fellowship from Great Western Research (GWR) awarded to N. Hinvest.
References (69)
- et al.
Impulsivity and history of drug dependence
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(1998) - et al.
Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting
NeuroImage
(2009) - et al.
Impulsivity, risk taking and recreational ‘ecstasy’ (MDMA) use
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2004) - et al.
The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
(2004) - et al.
Neurobiology of decision making: A selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective
Biological Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults
Personality and Individual Differences
(1985) - et al.
Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards
Behavioural Processes
(2005) - et al.
Response inhibition and impulsivity: An fMRI study
Neuropsychologia
(2003) - et al.
The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity
Personality and Individual Differences
(2010) - et al.
Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2005)
Mapping motor inhibition: Conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks
NeuroImage
Reliability and validity of the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) according to the SCID-P
European Psychiatry
Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task
NeuroImage
A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking
Developmental Disorders
Impulsivity and BOLD fMRI activation in MDMA users and healthy control subjects
Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: Review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making
Brain Research
Neural mechanism of intertemporal choice: From discounting future gains to future losses
Brain Research
The quick test (QT): Provisional manual
Psychological Reports
Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: A fMRI study
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: A quantitative analysis
Psychopharmacology
Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses
Journal of Neuroscience
Risk taking differences on a behavioural task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking
Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior
The adolescent brain
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making
Brain
Disrupted ‘reflection’ impulsivity in cannabis users but not current or former ecstasy users
Psychopharmacology
Response perseveration and ventral prefrontal sensitivity to reward and punishment in male problem gamblers and smokers
Neuropsychopharmacology
Individual differences in risk preference predict neural responses during financial decision-making
Brain Research
Elucidation of impulsivity
Australian Psychologist
Chronic cocaine but not chronic amphetamine use is associated with perseverative responding in humans
Psychopharmacology
Varieties of impulsivity
Psychopharmacology
A cross cultural study of impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults
Personality and Individual Differences
Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study
Proceedings of the National Academy Science United States of America
Cited by (37)
Neural correlates of delay discount alterations in addiction and psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging studies
2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Economists suggested that DD is processed based on consumption profiles known as continuity, transitivity, and completeness (Attema et al., 2018; Heilmann, 2017). The idea of DD has later been adopted in experimental psychology and clinical neuroscience (Hayden, 2016; Hinvest et al., 2011; Seifert, 2012). An altered DD may underlie some types of maladaptive behaviors observed in various psychiatric disorders including substance use disorders (SUD) (Amlung et al., 2019).
Vagal signaling and the somatic marker hypothesis: The effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on delay discounting is modulated by positive mood
2020, International Journal of PsychophysiologyThe role of emotions and physiological arousal in modulating impulsive behaviour
2018, Biological PsychologyNeural correlates of cognitive control in gambling disorder: a systematic review of fMRI studies
2017, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
- 1
Completed this study at the University of Manchester and now he has moved to the University of Bath.