Statistical discrimination of natural modes of motion in rat exploratory behavior
Section snippets
General introduction
This paper consists of three parts. In the first we show that given a time series of the coordinates of an exploring rat, one can decompose the behavior into several distinct modes of motion (first, second, third, and sometimes fourth gear). In the second part we illustrate the usefulness of the method, by showing that what has previously been labeled as stopping in rats, really corresponds to progression without leaving first gear. Finally, we test the generality of our method by analyzing
Density estimators
Density estimators (Silverman, 1980) are smoothed versions of histograms. They use moving bin location to obtain a more precise estimate of the concentration of observations at a given value. In this way the discontinuities displayed in the histogram, which are an artificial result of the non-overlapping bins, can be avoided, and better estimates are obtained. The curves obtained through a density estimator involve a choice of degree of smoothing. We choose the minimal degree of smoothing for
Part I: the decomposition of locomotor behavior into distinct modes
When placed in a large novel arena, rats alternate between full arrests, partial arrests involving scanning and stepping, walking, and running. We do not know a priori whether these categories represent convenient ad hoc landmarks within a continuum, or whether they stand for distinct and perhaps also discrete natural building blocks of behavior.
Part II: application to rat stopping behavior
We can now study the correspondence between behavior patterns that were previously established ad hoc, and the various modes of progression. One such pattern is stopping. It has been previously defined in a study performed in our lab in the following way: ‘When exploring a new environment a rat alternates between progressing (i.e. walking forward or running) and stopping: it progresses forward, then stops by performing so-called closing steps (in which the stepping leg lands besides the
Part 111: the generality of our method
Is our method applicable to any data set of a time series of x, y coordinates sampled at a rate of at least 10 Hz/s? Is it applicable to, e.g. mouse behavior? Can it distinguish modes of motion in this behavior, and if so, how many gears do mice use and what are the velocities that characterize the various modes? Do mice have a lingering mode, and if so, what is the spatial spread of lingering episodes? While a detailed comparison to rats is beyond the scope of the present study, preliminary
Discussion
Detailed studies of rat exploratory behavior done in our lab (Eilam and Golani, 1989, Eilam and Golani, 1990, Eilam and Golani, 1994, Eilam et al., 1989, Golani et al., 1993, Tchernichovski and Golani, 1995, Tchernichovski et al., 1996, Tchernichovski et al., 1998) and by others (Whishaw and Tomie, 1995, Cools et al., 1989, Cools et al., 1997, Gingras and Cools, 1997, Szechtman et al., 1998, Szechtman et al., 1999) revealed that in a novel environment rats establish an intricate structure of
Acknowledgements
Tirza Stern performed the stages of data digitation. We would also like to thank Ofer Tchernichovski for providing us with the hooded rats raw data, Neri Kafkafi for many productive discussions and suggestions, and both of them and Mark Shik for useful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by a grant from the Adams Super Center for Brain Studies, Tel Aviv University.
References (40)
- et al.
Defining stops in search pathways
J. Neurosci. Meth.
(1995) - et al.
Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment
Behav. Brain Res.
(1989) - et al.
Home base behavior in amphetamine-treated tame wild rats (Rattus norvegicus)
Behav. Br. Res.
(1990) - et al.
Agonist quinripole inducs perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perservation movements
Brain Res.
(1989) - et al.
Stopping behavior: constraints on exploration in rats (Rattus norvegicus)
Behav. Brain Res.
(1993) Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat
J. Neurosci. Meth.
(1984)- et al.
Random mutagenesis screen for dominant behavioral mutations in mice
Methods
(1997) Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors
Anim. Behav.
(1983)- et al.
Molecular, cellular, and neuroanatomical substrates of place learning
Neurobiol. Learning Memory
(1998) - et al.
A phase plane representation of rat exploratory behavior
J. Neurosci. Meth.
(1995)
Place learning in hippocampal rats and the path integration hypothesis
Neurosci. Biobehav. R.
The representation of space and the hippocampus in rats, robots and humans
Zeitschrift fur naturforchung
Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
Innate control of local search behavior in the house fly, Musca domestica
Physiol. Entomol.
Search after neurobiological profile of individual-specific features of wistar rats
Brain Res. Bull.
Differences in vulnerability and susceptibility to dexamphetamine in Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: a dose-effect analysis of spatio-temporal programming of behavior
Psychopharmacology
Amphetamine-induced stercotypy in rats: its morphogenesis in locale space from normal exploration
Navigation through vector addition
Nature
Cited by (133)
Age-related changes in the organization of spontaneously occurring behaviors
2022, Behavioural ProcessesDifferential organization of open field behavior in mice following acute or chronic simulated GCR exposure
2022, Behavioural Brain ResearchOrganization of exploratory behavior under dark conditions in female and male rats
2021, Behavioural Processes