Brief ReportsEnhanced behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine and personality traits in humans
Introduction
Behavioral sensitization is the process whereby repeated, intermittent exposure to stimulants such as amphetamine produces a progressively increasing and enduring enhancement in the behavioral response (Robinson and Becker 1986). Evidence from animal studies indicates that behavioral sensitization is a robust and replicable phenomenon. Factors that appear to influence the magnitude of the sensitization response include drug dose, length of time between doses (see Robinson and Becker 1986 for review), environment (Badiani et al 1995), and intrinsic factors such as gender Robinson 1984, Robinson and Becker 1986. In addition, there are certain behavioral characteristics of animals that appear to influence the sensitization response. For example, Piazza et al (1989) compared amphetamine response in rats who showed increased locomotor activity in novel environments (high response) to those with low activity (low response) and found that high responders demonstrated a significantly greater initial behavioral response to a high dose (1.5 mg/kg) of amphetamine than low responders. Thus, at least in animals, it appears that certain intrinsic characteristics contribute to individual differences in amphetamine sensitivity.
More recently, behavioral sensitization was systematically demonstrated for the first time in normal human volunteers (Strakowski et al 1995; Strakowski and Sax this issue). Significant increases in eye-blink rate, ratings of motor activity and energy level, and subjective ratings of drug effect were observed following a second (Strakowski et al 1995) and third (Strakowski and Sax in this issue) dose of d-amphetamine. Despite these significant findings, individual differences were observed in the behavioral response among subjects, suggesting that similar to animal research, there may be certain intrinsic characteristics associated with the sensitization response in humans. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether personality characteristics measured with the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) were associated with individual differences in the sensitization response previously reported (Strakowski and Sax this issue). We expected behavioral sensitization to be associated with the Novelty Seeking dimension of the TPQ, given previous studies indicating this characteristic is controlled by dopamine systems Cloninger 1987, Cloninger 1988.
Section snippets
Subjects
As previously mentioned, this study presents and extends the results of our previous findings (Strakowski and Sax this issue). Eleven normal volunteer subjects (6 men and 5 women) recruited by advertisement were included in this analysis. These subjects originally participated in our double-blind study examining the effects of three doses of d-amphetamine on behavior (Strakowski and Sax in press). Inclusion criteria were: 1) age 18–45 years, 2) no history of major DSM-III-R psychiatric or
Results
As previously reported (Strakowski and Sax this issue), subjects had a mean age of 24 years (SD = 2 years) and an average education of 16 years (SD = 2 years). There were 5 men and 6 women, and all were Caucasian.
Table 1presents values for the differences between the maximal change following dose 1 and the maximal change following dose 3 for the four behavioral measures as well as the TPQ results. The correlational analysis revealed only one significant correlation, which was between Novelty
Discussion
This study extends our previous findings of behavioral sensitization to repeated d-amphetamine challenge in normal volunteers (Strakowski et al 1996; Strakowski and Sax this issue) by demonstrating that individuals with a tendency toward greater novelty seeking have an increased behavioral sensitization response. Cloninger (1988) described novelty-seeking individuals as curious, exploratory, easily bored, impulsive, enthusiastic, and excitable. The results of this study suggest that humans with
Acknowledgements
Supported in part by a NIDA/VA Substance Abuse Medications Development Research Unit Award Y01 DA50038.
Our sincere appreciation to Lee Rosenberg for his assistance in data collection.
References (13)
- et al.
Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administrationA review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis
Brain Res Rev
(1986) - et al.
Affective state dependence of the tridimensional personality questionnaire
Psychiatry Res
(1995) - et al.
Enhanced response to repeated d-amphetamine challengeEvidence for behavioral sensitization in humans
Biol Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment
Psychopharmacology (Berl)
(1995) A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(1987)A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety statesA reply to commentaries
Psychiatr Dev
(1988)