Passive avoidance in psychopaths: The effects of reward

https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90021-IGet rights and content

Abstract

Psychopaths perform as well as controls on passive avoidance tasks involving monetary punishments, but display passive avoidance deficits on tasks involving monetary rewards as well as punishments. Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that availability of reward disrupts passive avoidance learning in psychopaths by inducing a state of behavioral activation that hampers their ability to modulate a dominant response set for reward. Results for Experiment 1 were consistent with this hypothesis: when pausing to process punishment feedback required interruption of a dominant response set for reward, psychopaths paused less and displayed poorer passive avoidance learning than controls. However, results from Experiments 2 and 3 provided no evidence that availability of reward per se induced excessive behavioral activation or interfered with response modulation in psychopaths. The results complement previous research demonstrating that psychopaths perseverate response sets for reward and highlight a potential link between response perseveration and processing cues for punishment. However, they raise doubts about theoretical explanations that posit overactivation by reward as the psychological process underlying psychopaths' disinhibited behavior. We propose that psychopaths' poor self-regulation may reflect difficulty switching attention to process ‘nondominant’ information that is important for guiding ongoing behavior.

References (36)

  • R.D. Hare

    A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1980)
  • J.F. Wallace et al.

    Differential effects of reward and punishment cues on response speed in anxious and impulsive individuals

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1990)
  • J. Aronfreed

    Conduct and conscience

    (1968)
  • R. Blackburn

    Psychopathy, delinquency and crime

  • F.A. Chesno et al.

    Effects of stimulation intensity on sociopathic avoidance learning

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1975)
  • H. Cleckley

    The mask of sanity

    (1976)
  • H.J. Eysenck

    Biological basis of personality

    (1967)
  • D.C. Fowles

    The three arousal model: Implications of Gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy

    Psychophysiology

    (1980)
  • E.E. Gorenstein et al.

    Disinhibitory psychopathology: A new perspective and a model for research

    Psychological Review

    (1980)
  • J.A. Gray

    The neuropsychology of anxiety

    (1982)
  • J.A. Gray

    The psychology of fear and stress

    (1987)
  • K.C. Gray et al.

    The psychopathic personality: A survey of Canadian psychiatrists' opinions

    Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal

    (1964)
  • R.D. Hare

    Psychopathy: Theory and research

    (1970)
  • R.D. Hare

    Electrodermal and cardiovascular correlates of psychopathy

  • R.D. Hare

    The Psychopathy Checklist

    (1985)
  • T.J. Harpur et al.

    Facilitation and inhibition of visual attention in psychopaths

  • E.W. Howland et al.

    Altering a dominant response set: Performance of psychopaths and low socialization students on a cued reaction time task

    (1990)
  • J.W. Jutai et al.

    Psychopathy and selective attention during performance of a complex perceptual-motor task

    Psychophysiology

    (1983)
  • Cited by (184)

    • Response-locked component of error monitoring in psychopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of error-related negativity/positivity

      2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the one hand, results related to reversal learning suggest that the maladaptive behavior is driven by abnormal processing of negative reinforce during reversal modalities of the task but not by the impossibility to adapt behavior from the error-commission. On the other hand, psychopathic individuals fail to inhibit punished responses during passive avoidance suggesting that initial learning rules are degraded (Blair et al., 2004; Newman et al., 1990). Nevertheless, the incapacity to reversal behavior to meet the demands of the task suggests that psychopathic individuals display abnormal processing of error-related information and are less sensitive to the negative feedback following an erroneous response.

    • Psychopathy traits and reinforcement sensitivity theory: Prepulse inhibition and ERP responses

      2019, Biological Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mainly our findings may provide a cue, in line with Newman’s response modulation hypothesis (Newman et al., 2010), suggesting that the deficient fear-potentiated startle in “fearless dominance” or primary psychopathy trait in the normal population may be attributable to problems in switching attention to salient aversive peripheral stimuli (Newman & Lorenz, 2003). This may explain the reduced performance observed in passive avoidance learning tasks (Newman, Patterson, Howland, & Nichols, 1990), diminished interference to peripherally presented distractors in a primary task (Newman, Schmitt, & Voss, 1997), abnormal modification of startle reflexes (Newman et al., 2010), and that attentional focus was found to moderate the negative relationship between “fearless dominance” and fear-potentiated startle (Dvorak-Bertsch et al., 2009). Unfortunately, we failed to find any significant neurocognitive profile in individuals with secondary psychopathy (Factor 2), suggesting that this trait may arise through partly distinct mechanisms, although our data do not elucidate what these mechanisms may be.

    • Incentive salience & psychopathy: A bio-behavioral exploration

      2019, Personality and Individual Differences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text