Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 587, Issue 2, 7 August 1992, Pages 306-312
Brain Research

Research report
Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(92)91012-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The current experiment examined the role of nucleus accumbens (NACC) dopamine in individual differences. Subjects were divided into high responders (HR) and low responders (LR) based on their locomotor response to a novel environment. HR rats were subjects which had a locomotor response to novelty in the upper third of the population sscreened and LR rats in the bottom third of the population. A new method of microdialysis was then used that allowed determination of the extracellular dopamine concentration. This was accomplished by adding various dopamine concentrations (0.0.5.0 and 20.0 nM) to the perfusate. The concentration of dopamine in the dialysate was subsequently determined. The difference in the dialysate and perfusate dopamine was regressed on the perfusate dopamine. The regression yielded the in vivo recovery and the extracellular concentration. HR rats exhibit a 250% higher basal dopamine concentration (6.45 ± 1.01 nM, n = 6) than LR rats (2.58 ± 0.16 nM, n = 7). The in vivo microdialysis recovery was used to estimate the extracellular dopamine followin cocaine challenge (15mg/kg) in the two groups. Following i.p. cocaine administration. HR rats had both a greater locomotor response and increase in absolute dopamine concentration compared to LR rats. The maximum dopamine concentration in the HR group was 2.3 ± 2.9 nM, while that in the LR group was only 8.6 ± 1.1 nM. The maximum on the LR group is comparable to the basal level in the HR group. However, there were no difference in percent change in dopamine following cocaine. These result provide further evidence in support of a role for variation in NACC dopamine in individual differences in vulnerability to psychomotor stimulants.

References (37)

Cited by (0)

View full text