Skip to main content
Log in

Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the present study, 24 patients suffering pain from a phantom limb were given vibratory stimulation or placebo as a pain-relieving measure. During stimulation, a reduction in pain was reported by 75% of the patients as compared to 44% during placebo. Depending on the phantom sensation, the best pain-reducing site was found to be either the area of pain or the antagonistic muscle. In 90% of the patients the best pain-reducing effect was obtained when stimulation was applied with moderate pressure over a large area. The results of the present study suggest that vibratory stimulation may be a valuable symptomatic treatment measure in patients suffering pain from a phantom limb.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramson AS, Feibel A (1981) The phantom phenomenon, its use and disuse. Bull NY Acad Med 57:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson SA, Holmgren E, Ross A (1977) Analgesic effects of peripheral conditioning stimulation. III. Effect of high frequency stimulation, segmental mechanisms interacting with pain. Acupunct Electro-Ther Res 2:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbut D, Polak JM, Wall PD (1981) Substance P in spinal cord dorsal horn decreases following peripheral nerve injury. Brain Res 205:289–298

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown WA (1968) Postamputation phantom limb. Dis Nerv Syst 299:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlen PC, Wall PD, Nadvorna H, Steinbach T (1978) Phantom limbs and related phenomena in recent traumatic amputations. Neurology (Minneap) 28:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang Hsian-Tung (1978) Neurophysiological basis of acupuncture analgesia. Sci Sin 21:829–846

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devor M, Claman D (1980) Mapping and plasticity of acid phosphatase afferents in the rat dorsal horn. Brain Res 190:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dostrovsky JO, Millar J, Wall PD (1976) The immediate shift of afferent drive of dorsal column nuclear cells following deafferentation: a comparison of acute and chronic deafferentation in gracile nucleus and spinal cord. Exp Neurol 52:480–495

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson M, Sjölund B (1976) Acupuncturelike electroanalgesia in TNS-resistent chronic pain. In: Zotterman Y (ed) Sensory functions of the skin. Pergamon Press, Oxford New York, pp 575–580

    Google Scholar 

  10. Handwerker MO, Iggo A, Zimmerman M (1975) Segmental and supraspinal actions on dorsal horn neurons responding to noxious and non-noxious skin stimuli. Pain 1:147–165

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horch KW, Lisney SJW (1981) Changes is primary afferent depolarization of sensory neurons during peripheral nerve regeneration in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 313:287–299

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunt SP, Rossop MN, Emson PC, Clement-Jones V (1982) Substance P and enkephalins in spinal cord after limb amputation. Lancet I:1023

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P (1983) Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain 17:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lundeberg T (1984) The pain suppressive effect of vibratory stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as compared to aspirin. Brain Res 294:201–209

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lundeberg T (1983) Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of chronic pain. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 523:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lundeberg T (1985) Naloxone does not reverse the pain-reducing effect of vibratory stimulation. Acta Anaesth Scand 29:212–216

    Google Scholar 

  17. Melzack R (1971) Phantom limb pain. Implications for treatment of pathological pain. Anesthesiology 35:409–419

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noordenbos W (1959) Pain. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Gall NG (1980) A survey of current phantom limb pain treatment in the United States. Pain 8:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sjölund BH, Eriksson MBE (1979) The influence of naloxone on analgesia produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation. Brain Res 73:295–301

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sunderland S (1978) Nerves and nerve injuries. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wall PD (1981) On the origin of pain associated with amputation. In: Siegfried J, Zimmermann M (eds) Phantom and stump pain. Springer, Berlein Heidelberg New York, pp 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wall PD, Devor MO (1981) The effect of peripheral nerve injury on dorsal root potentials and on transmission of afferent signals into the spinal cord. Brain Res 209:95–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundeberg, T. Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation. J Neurol 232, 79–82 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313905

Key words

Navigation